Professor Says It “Reeks of White Supremacist Patriarchy” to Use “2+2=4” As Standard for Objectivity


Well, what’s the latest bit of fodder to throw on the dumpster fire that is 2020?

Oh, that’s right. Math is racist.

A professor of math education has declared it to be both racist and patriarchal to use the phrase “2+2=4” to demonstrate objectivity and neutrality in mathematics.

“The idea that math (or data) is culturally neutral or in any way objective is a MYTH,” Laurie Rubel of Brooklyn College tweeted a week ago, The Blaze reports. “I’m ready to move on with that understanding. who’s coming with me?”

In a second tweet she added that “along with the ‘of course math is neutral because 2+2=4’ trope are the related (and creepy) ‘math is pure’ and ‘protect math,” and that it all “reeks of white supremacist patriarchy. I’d rather think on nurturing people & protecting the planet (with math in service of them goals).”

Are these people just competing to see how far-fetched the latest trend in intersectional philosophy or critical theory is going to be?

Good grief.

Well, Twitter being Twitter, you can imagine that lots of folks had reactions. Some chose to actually respond to her reasoning (if you can call it that), while others simple gawked at the absurdity of it all.

The Blaze notes that this isn’t the first time Rubel has gone out of her way to call something “racist” that is otherwise completely benign.

f Rubel’s stance sounds a bit familiar, it may be because she made some headlines a few years back with an academic paper arguing that rewards based on hard work are a “tool of whiteness” that oppresses minorities.

She added in her paper that in order to fix the problem teachers must incorporate social justice ideas into their lesson plans, a process she called “teaching for” social justice to lift up disadvantaged students.

The process “is providing students from underserved, marginalized groups access to challenging mathematics … with the critical equity-directed practices, or teaching about social justice. In other words, dominant equity-directed practices do not challenge the status quo,” she said in her paper for the Journal of Urban Mathematics Education.

If you appreciate the work we are doing to fight the leftist assault on our values, please consider a small donation to help us continue. Thank you so much!